I'm kind of a mix of a pragmatic agnostic and a moral apatheist. They're kinda related though.
Here's some info on them, shamelessly ripped from Wikipedia:
Apathetic agnosticism (also called pragmatic agnosticism) is the view that thousands of years of debate have neither proven, nor dis-proven, the existence of one or more deities. This view concludes that even if one or more deities exist, they do not appear to be concerned about the fate of humans. Therefore, their existence has little impact on personal human affairs and should be of little theological interest.
An apatheist may justify their decision using one of these perspectives, or they may combine all of the below to create their own attitude towards faith.
-- Absence of religious motivation --
This apatheistic argument states that morals are present in human society and do not rely on religion to be a part of the human experience. The existence or nonexistence of a god has no effect on the actions of humans and may actually cause more human suffering than benefit. Apatheists recognize that religion may provide a "comfort" for many people around the world, but apatheists do not need religion to be content with the morality of their lives and therefore live without it. This is known as "moral apatheism".
Just airing my beliefs, or lack thereof, I guess, like so many others











